Discussion:
[Bug varobj/23376] New: [8.1 -> 8.2 regression] gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp, with gdbserver
palves at redhat dot com
2018-07-06 15:15:25 UTC
Permalink
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23376

Bug ID: 23376
Summary: [8.1 -> 8.2 regression] gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp, with
gdbserver
Product: gdb
Version: unknown
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: varobj
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: palves at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---

On Fedora 27, with --target_board=native-gdbserver/native-extended-gdbserver,
comparing 8.1 vs 8.2/master test results, I see this regression:

-PASS: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: detach 4
-PASS: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: detach 5
-PASS: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: kill 6
+FAIL: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: detach 4
+FAIL: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: detach 5
+FAIL: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: kill 6

gdb.log shows:

detach inferior 3
Detaching from program:
build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/multi-forks/multi-forks, process 1474
Remote connection closed
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: detach 3
detach inferior 4
warning: Inferior ID 4 is not running.
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/multi-forks.exp: detach 4
detach inferior 5

Native testing passes cleanly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
sergiodj at redhat dot com
2018-07-09 19:32:45 UTC
Permalink
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23376

Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |sergiodj at redhat dot com
Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com> ---
This bug was apparently created by mistake, therefore closing as INVALID.

The actual bug related to the title:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23378

The actual bug related to the description:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23377
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Loading...